ARI Alliance for Responsible Infrastructure
Why It Matters Case Dates Take Action Property Impact Resources
MPUC Docket No. 2025-00276  Â·  Cumberland · Falmouth · Portland · Westbrook · Yarmouth

Stop CMP's Unnecessary $547 Million Transmission Line Expansion

Central Maine Power is pushing an industrial high-voltage line through Cumberland, Falmouth, Portland, Westbrook, and Yarmouth. CMP's own filings put the price tag at $546.97 million — and unless intervenors succeed in changing the record, that cost lands on Maine ratepayers through delivery rates, not on the region as a whole.

Take Action Now Attend MPUC Hearings Support the Legal Fund
This isn't only about cost — see the full case: property impact, rate fairness & a fair process ↓
$546.97M
Phase 1 cost estimate
5
towns on the route
115kV
new voltage class for the area
3–4 yrs
construction if approved
The Case

Why we're fighting this

CMP has applied to the Maine Public Utilities Commission for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to build Phase 1 of the "Greater Portland Transmission Upgrades" — new and rebuilt high-voltage lines and two new or expanded substations running through Cumberland, Falmouth, Portland, Westbrook, and Yarmouth. In several of these neighborhoods, this would be the first time high-voltage transmission infrastructure has been sited there at all, rather than an upgrade of an existing corridor residents already live alongside.

Landowner intervenors in the case — represented informally as the Falmouth Corridor Intervenors — have formally challenged whether the project is even needed at the scale CMP proposes. Their motion argues the load forecast behind the project relies on the same 2024 ISO New England forecasting methodology that Maine's own Office of the Public Advocate has already flagged for overestimating electric-vehicle and heat-pump adoption. The Commission's July 15, 2026 order expressly left that question open for this case.

Intervenors have also filed formal data requests asking CMP to state, in plain language, exactly how close energized 115kV wires will come to homes — including any home located near or under the line — and whether CMP has assessed places where the standard clearance can't be met, including near school bus stops where children wait outdoors.

Docket
2025-00276
Applicant
Central Maine Power (Avangrid)
Phase 1 cost estimate
$546.97M
Application complete
Jul 2026
Est. construction window
3–4 years
Regulator
Maine PUC
Read more: the full case, in brief

Need and cost are the heart of our challenge — but they're not the whole case. Here's the rest of it, briefly.

Property & Neighborhood Impact

Industrial towers in residential neighborhoods

CMP's design calls for roughly 90–120-foot steel structures and 100–150 feet of total cleared corridor — in several neighborhoods, the first high-voltage infrastructure ever sited there. Published research on transmission lines and nearby home values reports meaningful price effects for close-by properties.

See the published ranges →
Just & Reasonable Rates

100% of the cost falls on Maine ratepayers

ISO New England determined Phase 1 addresses localized needs, not regional grid reliability — so none of the $546.97M qualifies for regional cost-sharing. The full amount is instead recovered through Maine customers' delivery rates, and intervenors are asking the Commission to weigh whether that allocation and scale are justified.

Procedural Fairness

A rushed schedule and notice concerns

Intervenors have raised concerns about how well affected property owners across all five towns were notified before CMP filed, and about a hearing schedule that leaves little time for residents to review technical filings. Maine law (35-A M.R.S. § 3132(2)) lets the Commission grant schedule extensions for exactly this kind of disadvantage.

Participate Directly

Key MPUC case dates & live attendance access

Showing up — in person or on the live stream — puts community opposition directly in front of the Commissioners and the Hearing Examiner. Every date below is filed under Docket No. 2025-00276.

DateProceeding / MilestoneAttendanceWhat to do
Sept 3, 2026 CMP Technical Data Filing MPUC Case Management System — search Docket 2025-00276 Independent reviewers audit CMP's power-flow models as they're filed.
Sept 16–17, 20269:00 AM EDT Live Technical Conferences In person26 Katherine Dr, Hallowell, ME
VirtualMPUC Live Video
Attend or stream to show the Commission this community is watching.
Oct 23, 2026 Written Intervenor Testimony Due Electronic filing via CMS Formal expert and landowner testimony goes on the record.
Dec 2, 2026 Intervenor Technical Conference In person26 Katherine Dr, Hallowell, ME
VirtualMPUC Live Video
Live cross-examination of testimony from all parties.

Dates and venue per Docket 2025-00276 filings as of Sept 2026 — the Commission can amend its schedule, so confirm on the CMS portal before you travel. Clerk's office: (207) 287-3831.

Get Involved

Take action: 5 ways to protect our community

01

File as an MPUC intervenor

Submit a formal petition to intervene before the Commission to gain direct legal standing, request data, and join joint filings alongside other affected landowners.

What intervenor status gets you
  • Standing to request CMP's underlying data, models, and workpapers directly.
  • The right to file testimony and join cross-examination at technical conferences.
  • Eligibility to request intervenor funding assistance under 35-A M.R.S. § 1310-A for shared technical and legal costs.
02

Contact your town council

Ask your Town Manager and Councilors to formally petition the MPUC for a procedural pace that gives residents time to review CMP's technical filings, and to weigh in on routing and setback concerns before final design is locked in.

Yarmouth Town Council ↗ Cumberland Town Council ↗ Falmouth Town Council ↗ Westbrook City Council ↗ Portland City Council ↗
Talking points for your councilor
  • This introduces 115kV transmission infrastructure to areas that have never had it before — not simply an upgrade to an existing corridor.
  • Ask CMP to state, in writing, minimum clearance distances between energized wires and homes on your street.
  • Ask the Council to request the Commission examine lower-cost, less intrusive alternatives (battery storage, demand flexibility, staged investment) before approving the full build.
03

Contact your state legislator

Your state senator and representative can press the Commission directly and have more day-to-day leverage over MPUC proceedings than a town council does. Find and reach out to yours — a short call or email asking them to look into Docket 2025-00276 goes a long way.

Find Your State Senator ↗ Find Your State Representative ↗
Talking points for your legislator
  • Look up your senator and representative by your town on the official Maine Legislature directories linked above — Cumberland, Falmouth, Portland, Westbrook, and Yarmouth each fall into different districts.
  • Let them know CMP's $546.97 million Phase 1 project is entirely ratepayer-funded, with no regional cost-sharing, and ask them to raise that with the MPUC.
  • Ask them to support intervenor funding under 35-A M.R.S. § 1310-A and any legislation addressing transmission siting near homes and schools.
04

Submit impact photos from your property

If your property is along the route, photos looking toward the corridor help our technical consultant and legal team document real visual and access impacts for the case record.

Email Us Your Photos
How to take a useful photo
  • Stand at your typical vantage point (porch, driveway, kitchen window) and shoot toward the existing right-of-way.
  • Include one wide shot and one shot showing the nearest existing pole or tower for scale.
  • Note the date, your street, and roughly how far the wires sit from the shot in your email — no need to disclose your full address publicly.

Submissions are reviewed by our team before any public use — nothing is posted automatically.

05

Contribute to the legal & technical fund

We've engaged independent energy consultant Kay Aikin on a preliminary, no-cost basis, and filed for state intervenor funding under 35-A M.R.S. § 1310-A. Community contributions close the gap while that funding is pending — every dollar goes toward independent technical review and legal counsel for the case.

QR code linking to the Alliance for Responsible Infrastructure GoFundMe page
Give via GoFundMe ↗

Scan the code or use the link above. Contributions to the fund are not tax-deductible.

Property Impact

What this could mean for your property's value

We can't tell you exactly what CMP's proposed route will do to your specific home, and we aren't claiming CMP has caused any particular loss. What we can share is what published, independent research generally finds about homes near high-voltage transmission corridors — so you can weigh it for yourself.

See The Map

See the proposed route for yourself

CMP's own filings include maps of the proposed corridor through Cumberland, Falmouth, Portland, Westbrook, and Yarmouth — worth a look before using the estimator below.

View CMP's Project Maps ↗ Full Case File (MPUC) ↗
  • "Electric Transmission Lines and Rural Land" — real-analytics.com (PDF)
  • "The Impact of Transmission Lines on Residential Property Values" (case study, a suburb of Wellington, NZ) — ResearchGate
  • "Do You Want Your Children Playing under Those Things?" — Assessment Journal, International Association of Assessing Officers (PDF)

What this is — and isn't. These ranges come from published, independent research on transmission lines and residential property values in general. They are not a property-specific appraisal, and they are not a claim that CMP's project has caused, or will cause, any particular loss to any particular home. We're sharing this because it's publicly available information directly relevant to residents deciding how to respond to this case — not as an accusation against CMP.

Not sure which zone your property falls in? Submit a photo from your property and our team can help you get oriented relative to the proposed route.

Resource Library

Read the case for yourself

Everything below is drawn directly from filings under Docket No. 2025-00276. Formal PDFs are being finalized for handouts and door-knocking — read the summaries now, or download a plain-text copy.

01 — Overview

Fact Sheet & Talking Points

A one-page summary of the project, its cost, the towns affected, and the open questions in the case — built for sharing at your door or at a town meeting.

Read on this page
02 — Open Questions

The Case Record So Far

What CMP has been formally asked to answer, and why intervenors dispute the underlying need — sourced from the joint data requests and the motion on need.

Read on this page
03 — For Landowners

Visual Impact Documentation Guide

Step-by-step instructions for photographing and logging how the proposed line would affect your property's view, access, and use — useful whether or not you end up filing testimony.

Read on this page
Alliance for Responsible Infrastructure
Organized by landowners and residents in Cumberland, Falmouth, Portland, Westbrook & Yarmouth, ME
Contact: portlandnorthelectric@gmail.com
  • State of Maine PUC, Docket No. 2025-00276 — CMP Petition for CPCN, Greater Portland Transmission Upgrades
  • Intervenor Motion to Establish a Threshold Merits Phase on Load Forecasting (filed Sept 2026)
  • Joint Landowner Data Requests to CMP (response due Sept 3, 2026)
  • Maine PUC, "How to Participate" and Case Management System, https://www.maine.gov/mpuc
  • Published research on transmission-line proximity and residential property values (see Property Impact section for sources)
0
Skip to Content
Stop The CMP Line
STOP the CMP Line
Stop The CMP Line
STOP the CMP Line
STOP the CMP Line

Alliance for Responsible Infrastructure

Made with Squarespace

 portlandnorthelectric@gmail.com